RAM SHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. SUGAR INDUSTRY and CANE DEVE
WRIA/3989/2015 · 2025-12-11
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203245 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203245 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3989 of 2015 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 11, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjani Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anand Shanker Asthana, K.S.Pawar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Shankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Sugar Industry And Cane Deve .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench