SATYANAM DAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
A482/10340/2025 · 2025-12-10
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203244 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203244 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10340 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard Sri Lal Bahadur Khan, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Badrul Hasan, the learned AGA for the State of U.P. and Sri M.B. Singh, Advocate, who has filed Vakalatnama alongwith Sri Vikas Singh, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party No. 2/complainant in the Court today, which is taken on record, as well as perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking following main relief(s):-
"It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned order dt. 14.10.2025 passed by the trial court/ADJ/Fast Track IInd Civil Court, Lucknow by means of which the discharge application filed by the applicant has been rejected while fixing the case for framing of charges, in Criminal Case No. 24502 of 2023 (State Vs. Satnam Das) (Case Crime no. 96 of 2022, U/s 376, 377, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. P.S. Sarojani Nagar, Lucknow) and the further entire proceedings of trial. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the further proceeding of Criminal Case No. 24502 of 2023 (State Vs. Satnam Das) arising from Case Crime no. 96 of 2022, U/s 376, 377, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. P.S. Sarojani Nagar, Lucknow, during the pendency of the present application before this Hon'ble court, and/ or may be pleased to pass such other and further orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparably."
3. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application with proper prayer(s), pleadings and documents in support thereof. 4. The aforesaid has not been opposed. 5. In view of the above, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. 6. Office is directed to return certified/original copies of the documents annexed with this application to the learned counsel for the applicant as per relevant Rules in this regard. December 10, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lal Bahadur Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Satyanam Das .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy.
Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench