HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6004 of 2014 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Rajvanshi, Sanjeev Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Avinash Pandey (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Arun Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Local Bodies Lko .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench