HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7048 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Sachin Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ram Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that subsequent to filing of the petition, a fresh recovery certificate has been issued against the petitioner and the petitioner's grievance stands redressed. Therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. December 10, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shobhit Mohan Shukla (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Suman Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench