SHAHIDA BANO v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO. and ORS
WRIA/21783/2016 · 2025-12-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203232 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203232 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 21783 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Srivastava, Durga Prasad Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., J.B.S. Rathour (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Shahida Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko. And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench