HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10418 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Deepak Kumar, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed by the applicants mainly with the prayer to quash the Charge sheet dated 06.02.2021 numbering 01 filed against the applicants, arising out of Case crime No. 33 of 2021, U/S- 308/323/504 IPC, Police Station Bangarmau, District Unnao, bearing title "State Vs. Ram Balak & Others" pending before the Additional Session Judge Court No. 7 Unnao, in Session Trial No. 1613/2023, which is annexed as Annexure no. 1 to this application and the consequent proceedings thereto. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 3 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sagar Singh, Gaurav Joshi, Shri Ram Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Balak And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 11, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 10418 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench