KALLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.andORS.
WRIA/21615/2016 · 2025-12-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203204 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203204 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 21615 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey, Yogesh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ghaus Beg, M.M. Asthana, Ram Chandra Dwivedi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Kallu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench