Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35514 Court No. - 37 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5432 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deena Nath Yadav Respondent :- State Of Up And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 4 and Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.5/Gram Sabha. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation/application moved by the petitioner dated 17.12.2024. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5/Gram Sabha has made a statement before the Court that the aforesaid representation/application dated 17.12.2024 has already been considered and decided by a detailed order dated 08.03.2025 by the District Magistrate/respondent no.2. 4. In view of the aforesaid, present writ petition has become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. 5. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, a copy of instructions along with order dated 08.03.2025 has been supplied by Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.5/Gram Sabha to learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Needless to say that it is open for the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order dated 08.03.2025 before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad