Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20318 (GAU)

LAXMAN SHARMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/3126/2019 · 2025-07-27

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010228432019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3126/2019 In WP(C)/3549/2018 LAXMAN SHARMA S/O LT. KEDAR SHARMA, R/O FLAT NO. 5, LIG BUILDING NO. 4, HOUSE NO. 4 KHARGULI, P.O. SILPUKHURI, P.S. LATASIL, DIST. KAMRUP (M), GUWAHATI 781003 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE CHAIRMAN ASSAM STATE HOUSING BOARD R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI 05 3:THE COMMISSIONER ASSAM STATE HOUDING BOARD R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI 05 4:THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSAM STATE HOUSING BOARD R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI 0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL, MS. N NASRIN,MD. I H KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, A S H B Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 28-07-2025 Heard Shri M. U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Kalita, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri T. R. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Housing Board. Shri Mondal, the learned counsel has submitted that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. He has also informed that in the meantime, the petitioner has vacated the premises in question. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court is of the opinion that there is no live cause of action which would require adjudication. IA is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant