HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1228 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Dinesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Dheeraj Ojha, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that because of certain defects that have crept in the petition, the petitioner does not want to press the present petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. 3. The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 4. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same on record. December 10, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Mo. Shakeel Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Govt. Lko. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench