VEER PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.FOREST CIVIL SECTT. LKO. and ORS.
WRIA/22415/2016 · 2025-12-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203162 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203162 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 22415 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Karunesh Singh Pawar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Arvind Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Veer Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Forest Civil Sectt. Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench