Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203160 (ALL)

SMT. LATA SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. DEPTT. TELECOM, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION, NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/14110/2025 · 2025-12-10

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14110 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for Union of India and Shri Dwijendra Mishra, learned Counsel for the opposite parties no.2 and 3. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that privilege leave encashment has not been paid though the petitioner has retired way back on 30.06.2025. 3. Nevertheless, considering the nature of grievance, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the opposite party no.3 to look into the matter, verify the facts and take a decision as regards payment of entire post retiral dues, GPF, Gratuity and remaining salary for the month of January, February and June, 2025, and privilege leave encashment to the petitioner within two months from the date a copy of this order is submitted. Needless to say that if any interest is payable on the said amount, the same shall also be paid as per rules. December 10, 2025 Ram Murti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Singh Rajawat, Shobha Devi, Sunder Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Lata Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Telecom, Ministry Of Communication, New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench