Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20316 (GAU)

TINKU SOM v. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/7140/2022 · 2025-04-04

Manash Ranjan Pathak

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010228302022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7140/2022 TINKU SOM W/O- LT. SANJIB KUMAR RABHA, ADDRESS- NIVA VILLA, H.NO. 81, CHANDMARI, PUB SARANIA MAIN ROAD, NEAR RAIL CROSSING, P.S. CHANDMARI, GHY-03, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND 3 ORS. (ASSAM POLICE), ADDRESS- DGP OFFICE, B.BARUAH ROAD, ULUBARI, GHY-07, ASSAM 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (ASSAM POLICE) GUWAHATI CITY ADDRESS- MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD PANBAZAR GHY-01 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE (ASSAM POLICE) DISPUR P.S. ADDRESS- DISPUR P.S. DISPUR GHY-06 ASSAM 4:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE AIZAWL (MIZORAM POLICE) ADDRESS- AIZAWL P.S. UPPER BAZAR DAWRPUI Page No.# 2/2 AIZAWL MIZORAM- 79600 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAMARIA, MR A N SARMAH,MR M M ZAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI ORDER 05.04.2025 (M.R.Pathak, J) Heard Mr. M M Zaman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R Talukdar, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. On instruction of the petitioner, his counsel, Mr. M M Zaman, is not pressing this writ petition, to which Mr. R Talukdar, learned Government Advocate, Assam has no objection. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition, being not pressed, stands dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant