HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7142 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Durgesh Kumar Rawat, the learned counsel for the petitioners, who stated that he does not want to press this petition at this stage as the claim petition was being fixed for petitioners' evidence since long and evidence has been filed only today itself and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition at an appropriate stage. 2. The instant petition is hereby dismissed as not pressed leaving it open for the petitioners to file a fresh petition at appropriate stage. 3. Let the certified copies be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining their photocopies on record. December 11, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durgesh Kumar Rawat, Nishant, Raj Bahadur Singh Rawat, Ravindra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Mangu And Another .....Petitioner(s) Radhey Shyam Yadav And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench