HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7103 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sandeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, District - Faizabad/Ayodhya to decide Case No. 165/2004550423030005 - Kalawati Vs. Laxminarayan and Others, U/S 9(A)2 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, District - Faizabad/Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, District - Faizabad/Ayodhya, is directed to decide Case No. 165/2004550423030005 - Kalawati Vs. Laxminarayan and Others, U/S 9(A)2 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment, subject to the condition that petitioner or his counsel appears on each date fixed by the Court concerned, failing which benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Kalawati Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, Faizabad And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench