DINESH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1921/2024 · 2025-12-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203142 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203142 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1921 of 2024
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Ms. Ayushi Mishra, learned counsel holding brief of Ms. Nandani Verma, learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State; Shri Pravin Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the informant and perused the records.
2. Present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.48 of 2023, under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 354, 376, 120B IPC & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Barabanki.
3. The applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail vide order dated
27.08.2024. There is no material to suggest that the applicant has misused the said liberty. It is informed that charge-sheet has been filed.
4. Learned AGA opposes the bail application.
5. Considering the aforesaid, the interim anticipatory bail granted vide order dated 27.08.2024 is confirmed and the applicant namely Dinesh Singh is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of the trial, subject to his furnishing a personal bond with two fresh sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of Court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amar Singh, Mahendra Pratap Singh, Mohammed Mustafa Khan, Nandini Verma, Parimal Bhatt, Rajat Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Satendra Singh Solanki, Pravin Kumar Verma Dinesh Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed in above terms. December 10, 2025 nishant ABAIL No. 1921 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench