Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203111 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD JIKRIYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14235/2025 · 2025-12-10

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14235 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4, Mr. Pradeep Kumaar Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no. 3 i.e. General Manager (Personnel) to decide the representation dated 29.09.2025 contained as (Annexure No.1) preferred by the petitioner and also if any dues is found payable to the petitioner the same shall be paid to the petitioner within time bound period in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the benefit of IInd A.C.P grade par Rs 2800/ since 01.12.2008 instead of 03.08.2015 and third A.C.P grade pay Rs 4200/- since 03.08.2015 which is wrongfully denied to the petitioner in the light of circular dated 20.06.2025 passed by Managing Director Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.4 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Narayan Shukla, Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava Mohammad Jikriya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4/Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Ayodhya Road, Ayodhya, within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.4 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 10, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 14235 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench