Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:25462 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.778 of 2025 in CWP No.8118 of 2025 Decided on: 31.07.2025 Vijay Kumar
… Petitioner Versus Sh. Bhupender Kumar, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Shimla & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner : Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Mr. Rajesh Kosh, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vivek Sharma, learned counsel, Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Rajesh Kosh, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 and 3, respectively. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of three weeks from today. Their statements are taken on record.
3. These proceedings are accordingly closed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek the revival thereof, if the needful is not done within a period of three weeks from today by the Authority concerned. Notices stand discharged.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge July 31, 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?