MOHD. JUNAID SIDDIQUI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/10886/2025 · 2025-12-10
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203109 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203109 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10886 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3 and Sri Manish Chandra Yadav, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the first information report dated 23.10.2023 bearing no.0001 of 2023 under Sections 406, 420, 504 & 370 IPC, lodged at Police Station Anti Human Trafficking Unit, District Lucknow. Further prayer is for a mandamus commanding the respondent nos.1, 2 & 3 not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR.
3. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioner and respondent no.4 have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 27.10.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-4 to the petition.
4. Learned counsel for the parties also state that in the compromise which has been entered into between the parties, it has duly been indicated that respondent No.4 does not intend to proceed against any of the other accused as named in the FIR.
5. This Court vide order dated 26.11.2025 had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Azizullah Khan, Mohammad Alishah Faruqi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Saurabh Mishra Mohd. Junaid Siddiqui .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 26.11.2025, the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 03.12.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioner and respondent no.4.
7. As per the said compromise, the petitioner and respondent no.4 have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably.
8. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The FIR No. 0001 of 2023 under Sections 406, 420, 504 & 370 IPC, lodged at Police Station Anti Human Trafficking Unit, District Lucknow and consequential proceedings arising out of impugned F.I.R., are hereby quashed. December 10, 2025 Reena/- CRLP No. 10886 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench