HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10360 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1; and Sri Ashish Kumar, Sri Raj Kumar Pandey and Ms. Shruti Srivastava, learned counsels, who have filed power on behalf of opposite party nos.2 to 6, which is taken on record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking following main relief(s):- "I. To allow the petition of the petitioners U/S-482 CrPC (now Section 528 BNSS) and quash the criminal proceeding arising out of ST. No- 198/2008, Crime No. 123 of 2007, U/S- 147/148/307/384/323/34,/325/34,506/336 IPC, P.S. Thakurganj, District- Lucknow further quash the impugned charge-sheet as well as in the case pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.4. Lucknow (annexed as Annexure Nos. 11 & 13 respectively). ii. To quash the entire criminal prosecution in the court ADJ-4/Special Judge EC Act as "State Vs Susheel Kumar and Others arising out of case lodged at ST. No-196/2008, Crime No. 123 of 2007, U/S- 147/148/307/384/ 323/34,/325/34,506/336 IPC, P.S.-Thakurganj, District- Lucknow. iii. To quash the entire criminal proceeding of the impugned case wherein Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Verma, Arvind Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Susheel Kumar @ Susheel Kumar Rawat And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) the accused petitioners namely 1- Susheel Kumar @ Susheel Kumar Rawat, 2-Rajesh Kumar, 3-Mohmmad Rafeeq, 4-Sudheer Rawat @ Sudheer Kumar Rawat, 5- Anil @ Anil Kumar are facing trail, in view of the settlement deed formulated between the parties to the dispute." 3. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed dated 21.11.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-21 to the application, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned. 5. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to both the parties to appear before the court concerned on 19.12.2025 and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from that date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid complaint case. 7. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. December 10, 2025 Mohit Singh/- A482 No. 10360 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench