Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203091 (ALL)

SATEESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

NABAIL/807/2025 · 2025-12-10

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 807 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.102 of 2025, under Sections 366, 376, 506 IPC, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Patti, District Pratapgarh. 3. The applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 3.7.2025. 4. No material has been filed to indicate that the applicant is not cooperating with the trial. In view thereof, the anticipatory bail is extended till the conclusion of trial. 5. The sureties furnished vide in pursuance to order dated 3.7.2025 shall remain valid till conclusion of trial. 6. The application is disposed of. December 10, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pranjal Singh, Gyan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Neeraj Mani Tripathi, Ranjeet Pratap Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Sateesh Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench