Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20309 (RAJ)

MOHAN LAL S/O SHREERAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6956/2025 · 2025-06-04

Mukesh Rajpurohit V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22917] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6956/2025 Mohan Lal S/o Shreeram, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Jawahar Colony, Police Station Mahuwa, District Dausa.(Raj) At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City. ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy.GA. Mr. Ashish Bairwa Mr. Sonu Sharma, (complainant-present in person) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 04/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.460/2023 registered at Police Station Nai Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 417, 418, 420, 467, 468 471 and 120-B of IPC and later on for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 478, 471 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the compromise has arrived between the parties and the complainant has filed an affidavit in this regard. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 07.05.2025 and the conclusion of [2025:RJ-JP:22917] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6956/2025] the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. The complainant-Mr. Sonu Sharma is present in the Court and identified by his counsel. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an affidavit with regard to compromise arrived between the parties which is already on record and he has no objection if the petitioner is being given benefit of bail. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the affidavit submitted by the complainant-Mr. Sonu Sharma with regard to compromise arrived between him and the accused-petitioner-Mohan Lal and the fact that the petitioner is behind the bars since 07.05.2025, but, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Mohan Lal S/o Shreeram is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J PRAGATI/150