HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1184 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1. 2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondent no. 2 is dispensed with. 3. The controversy raised in the present case pertains to succession of the property which was recorded in the name of one Parsadi. The petitioners claim to be successors in interest of the daughter of Parsadi and claim that on the basis of succession they are entitled to the said property, while on the other hand private respondent claim the said property on the basis of will executed by Parsadi in his favour. The petitioners are attempting to impeach the validity of the will in the proceedings. It is in these chain of events that the matter has reached till Deputy Director of Consolidation who in Case No. 0572 of 2025 has stayed the operation of order of Settlement Officer (Consolidation) dated 13.10.2025 and has proceeded to hear the revision. The petitioners are aggrieved by the interim order dated 19.11.2025, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. 4. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that considering the fact that proceedings are pending since 1981 and the matter has not yet attained finality, grievance of petitioners shall be substantially redressed in case Deputy Director of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ali, Perwaiz Wahab Khan, Tanzeem Fatima Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shree Ram And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Consolidation is directed to conclude the revision proceedings with expedition in accordance with law. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not oppose the aforesaid innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. The petitioners undertake to cooperate in the proceedings before the Deputy Director of Consolidation and file their objections and pleas they wish to raise, within next four weeks from today. 7. It is provided that the Deputy Director of Consolidation while determining the rights of the parties finally, will take into consideration all the arguments raised by the parties including that of the petitioners. It is also noted that the impugned order is merely an interim order and not final determination of the rights of the parties. 8. Accordingly, in the light of above, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lucknow to proceed to hear and decide the revision No. 0572 of 2025, with expedition say within eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order in accordance with law. December 10, 2025 A. Verma WRIB No. 1184 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench