HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4541 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 14, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajeev Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ghaus Beg, M.M. Asthana, Om Prakash Mani Tripathi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Naresh Maurya And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench