Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203052 (ALL)

BRIJENDRA MANI PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDU. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/13071/2025 · 2025-11-12

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13071 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Devesh Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 & 2, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 & 4 and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "(1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties, to pay the General Provident Fund (GPF) to the petitioner from the period of 01.01.1976 to 31.03.1999 along with 18% interest, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to determine the pension of the petitioner considering the service rendered by the petitioner from 1.7.1976 to 31.03.1999 at Surji Devi Vidya Mandir Junior High School, Pratapgarh. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 4 i. e. The Finance Account Officer (Basic Education) Pratapgarh to take decision on the application of the petitioner dated 14.12.2022, as contained in Annexure No. 6 to this writ petition." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.3 to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Nath Dubey, Ankit Dubey, Lalit Shukla, Swati Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh Brijendra Mani Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Edu. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3/District Basic Education Officer, Pratapgarh within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of two months. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 12, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13071 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench