Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20304 (RAJ)

RADHA WIFE OF MAHENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/1067/2025 · 2025-07-31

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29233-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 1067/2025 IN D.B. Criminal Appeal No.174/2025 Radha Wife Of Mahendra Singh, Resident Of Village Pipari Police Station Bayana District Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Mahila Bandi Sudhar Grah, Central Jail Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Aniket Sharma. Mr. Gaurav Sharma. Mr. Saurabh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, Additional Government Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 31/07/2025 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel for the applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that the life imprisonment has been awarded to the applicant under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC and she is in judicial custody at Central Jail, Bharatpur. He further submits that the applicant is a lady and she has been falsely implicated in this matter. He further submits that as per the ‘Parcha Bayan’ of the [2025:RJ-JP:29233-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1067/2025] deceased, the applicant has not attributed any serious injury. He further submits that the hearing of appeal may take long time and prayed that sentence awarded to the applicant may be suspended and she be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the suspension of sentence application. 4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that the applicant is a lady and she was on bail during trial and the hearing of appeal may take long time, We deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 6. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before this Court on 26.08.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/31