RAJKUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. STATE TAX DEPTT. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/13075/2025 · 2025-11-12
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13075 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties 1 to 5. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.6 stand dispensed with.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging charge sheet dated 21.11.2024 and enquiry report dated
29.05.2025. Other concomitant prayer has also been made with regard to absolving petitioner from charges and restoring him in service.
3. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned State Counsel at the very outset has raised a preliminary objection regarding entertainability of this petition in view of fact that only enquiry report has been challenged which is in nature of recommendation without any final orders having been passed or challenged.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the charges indicated in the charge sheet itself could not have been included, as charges 1 and 2 pertain to the same issue.
5. Nonetheless, it is submitted that after submission of enquiry report dated 29.05.2025, a show cause notice was issued to petitioner and has been replied to by him in terms of Rule 9 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999.
6. Learned State Counsel however, submits that as on date petitioner has Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajkumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. State Tax Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
not submitted any reply.
7. In view of aforesaid, in case petitioner has already submitted his reply, then the proceedings shall be concluded within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon authority concerned.
8. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 12, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 13075 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench