JYOTSANA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/11029/2025 · 2025-11-14
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203032 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203032 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11029 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Ambrish Kumar Dwivedi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Trideep Narayan Pandey, the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction for removal of the encroachment made by the private respondents over Gata No.671 as also over gaon sabha land bearing Gata No.672.
3. On the basis of instructions, the learned State Counsel has submitted that the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 have already been instituted for removal of encroachment on the land bearing Gata No.671. There is no encroachment over land bearing Gata No.672 which is record as abadi.
4. Proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 have already been instituted for removal of encroachment over gaon sabha land which forms a part of Gata No.671.
5. So far as the encroachment made by private respondents upon the petitioner's land being a part of Gata No.671, the petitioner should institute a suit under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code before the Sub-Divisional Officer.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed off by directing the authorities to conclude the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 expeditiously, in accordance with law and leaving it open for the petitioner to institute proceedings under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code which would be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law. November 14, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambrish Kumar Dwivedi, Abhishek Dwivedi, Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Harshita Dwivedi, Rohit Shukla, Satyam Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Jyotsana Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench