PUNJAB STATE ELECT. BOARD v. PRESIDING OFFICER,LABOUR COURT GURDASPUR & ANR.
CWP/11743/2000 · 2025-02-04
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20302 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20302 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
!#
1. In th dated 09.1 was struck for recallin vide order
2. The the Labour of now afte
3. Lear respondent the petition ++,-./0111)
2*
!"#$ !#
!
"#
!
!$"#
!%!
&&&&& %#&'%"'#()
* In the present petition, the challen d 09.12.1999 (Annexure P-2), by wh struck off as no written statement was recalling of the said order has been d
order dated 16.03.2000 (Annexure P The present writ petition was admitt bour Court were stayed, which posi ow after a period of 24 years.
Learned counsel for the petitioner ondent-workman had died hence, the petitioner may kindly be set aside so - 1 –
++,-./0111)
2*
"/3$#!#1-100104
!!!
'(
#%#&'%"'#
hallenge has been laid to the order by which defence of the petitioner nt was filed and even the application een dismissed by the Labour Court ure P-6). admitted and the proceedings before h position remains the same even as itioner submits that eventually the e, the orders striking out defence of de so that in case, legal heirs of the –
order ioner ation ourt efore en as the ce of f the VINOD KUMAR 2025.02.10 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
respondent Labour Co
4. Kee of respond petitioner Annexures appear bef the matter appropriate year from that due no
5. The 11.03.2025
5 6#37
) * *
++,-./0111)
2* ondent-workman intend, the matter c our Court. Keeping in view the facts that learne espondent no.2-workman has not o ioner, the present writ petition is exures P-2 and P-6 are set aside an ar before the Labour Court and parti atter relates back to 2- ½ decades, th opriate decision on the issue raised be from the date of receipt of certified co due notice is given to the legal heirs of The parties are directed to appear
3.2025. 51-(0104
*
+,
*
(
- 2 – atter can be adjudicated before the
learned counsel appearing on behalf not objected to the prayer of the ion is allowed, impugned orders ide and the parties are allowed to participate in the proceedings. As , the Labour Court is directed that sed be passed within a period of one fied copy of this order after ensuring eirs of the petitioner. appear before the Labour Court on
) !#%#&'%"'#*
3&
- ,)
- ,) –
e the ehalf f the rders d to . As that f one uring on * VINOD KUMAR 2025.02.10 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document