- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9428 WP No. 51043 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 51043 OF 2016 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT J YAMUNA (WRONGLY SHOWN AS J. JAYAMMA) W/O K.SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT PARINITHA JAYARAM ESTATE, JAKKUR BENGALURU NORTH TLAUK BENGALURU-560 064 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K RAMA BHAT., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, 1ST FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK, VISVESVARAIAH TOWERS DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPUR BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203 3. THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110 4. SRI.N.DEVARAJ S/O MUNIYAPPA Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9428 WP No. 51043 of 2016 AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF THANISANDRA K.R.PURAM HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU -560 077 5. SRI MUNIDEVAPPA @ PAPANNA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SOMATHANAHALLI CHANNARAYPATANA HOBLI, DEVENAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 129 6. SMT. CHANNAMMA W/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDENT OF THANISANDRA K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-560 077 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH.K., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-3; SRI. SUNIL SESHAGIRI RAO., ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-6; SRI. N.DILLI RAJAN., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.N.SUBBA REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-P THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.06.2016 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/ R-1, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN CASE NO.REV. PET. 21/2009-10 DATED 09.06.2016, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9428 WP No. 51043 of 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60