SUBODH KUMAR RAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF STAMP AND REGISTRATION LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/13230/2025 · 2025-11-14
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203017 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203017 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13230 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Vivek Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was working on the post of Sub Registrar in the department of Stamps and Registration, Uttar Pradesh, and when lastly he was serving in Gorakhpur departmental proceedings were initiated against him for certain misconduct. It is during pendency of disciplinary proceedings that the petitioner was attached to Prayagraj. It has also been submitted that disciplinary proceedings have been concluded by means of order dated 17.09.2025, wherein the petitioner has been found to be guilty of Charge No. 1 and also Charge No. 3 has been partially proved, imposing a punishment of stoppage of two increments.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that once the disciplinary proceedings have been concluded, then regular order of posting is required to be passed and submits that in this regard a representation has already been given to the opposite party No. 2, i.e. Inspector General (Registration), Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for suitable direction to decide his representation.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Subodh Kumar Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Stamp And Registration Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
by the counsel for the petitioner.
6. In view of the above, opposite party No. 2, i.e., Inspector General (Registration), Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, is directed to decide representation of the petitioner (Annexure- 1 to the writ petition) within 3 months from the date a certified copy of this order alongwith copy of Annexure- 1 to the writ petition, is filed before him, and communicate the decision to the petitioner within a week thereafter. November 14, 2025 A.Nigam WRIA No. 13230 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench