HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6641 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioners and as such, the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 12, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brij Bhushan Singh, Pranjal Apurva, Sandeep Kumar Mishra, Vikas Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Ram Anup And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench