Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203011 (ALL)

SUNITA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/10472/2025 · 2025-11-14

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10472 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petition has sought for the following substantial relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing of that part of the impugned letter/order dated 08/05/2025 passed by opposite party no.2, so for relates to the petitioner, by which he has been illegally and without applying his judicial mind rejected the death claim of the petitioner, which is contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition." 3. Upon hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we quash and set aside the letter/ order dated 08.05.2025 insofar as it relates to the petitioner with a direction upon the authorities to consider the application of the petitioner once again. 4. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file further documents to evidence his claim under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyna Yojna. 5. The reasoned order should be passed within a period of twelve weeks from date. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, Ravindra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sunita Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 14, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10472 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench