M.SAKUBER SADHIK v. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/29726/2025 · 2025-10-31
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203003 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203003 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 29726 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 31-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 29726 of 2025
1. M.Sakuber Sadhik S/o.Mohammed Ali Jinna, No.96, TNHB Phase-3, Abdul Kalam Nagar, Ambattur, Chennai-600 058. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, CCB Avadi City Police Station, Chennai District. Cr.No.89/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Cr.No.89/2025 on the file of respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): G.Mohammed Aseef For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 29726 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.09.2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 408 of IPC in Crime No.89 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The allegation against this petitioner is that while managing the shop of the de facto complainant, the petitioner misappropriated a sum of Rs.78,19,575/- between January 2018 and December 2022. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had already paid a sum of Rs.1,10,000/- and had not misappropriated extent of money as stated. All payments were made to the suppliers' accounts, and the de facto complainant had not properly accounted for these payments. The de facto complainant's son is now looking after the business and is ready to abide by any condition imposed by this court. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in incarceration since 09.09.2025 and further incarceration is not necessary. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. The Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reported that the total money misappropriated by the petitioner through https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 29726 of 2025 falsification of accounts and fabrication of records is Rs.78,19,575/- and the co- accused A2 is still absconding, and so far, no money has been recovered. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has been arrested and so far no money has been recovered and A2 is still absconding, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. 31-10-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No mpa To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee. 2.The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, CCB Avadi City Police Station, Chennai District. Cr.No.89/2025.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 29726 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 29726 of 2025
31-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis