HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6787 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, Shri Manoj Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioner and as such, the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA for the State could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 5. Interim order, if any, stands discharged. November 12, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amarendra Kumar Bajpai, Tapasya Bajpai, Tejaswini Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Manoj Kumar Misra (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Devendra Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Govt. Of U.P. Deptt. Of Home And Vigilance Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench