AAKASH KUMAR @ ANOOP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/5743/2025 · 2025-11-12
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202992 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202992 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5743 of 2025
. Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and learned Counsel for the complainant.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.63 of 2025, under Sections 65(2), 351(3) of BNS and Section 5m/ 6 POCSO Act, Police Station Sharda Nagar, District Kheri.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 10 years was enticed by the applicant and wrong was committed. The FIR was lodged 13.03.2025 alleging that the offence was committed on 06.03.2025. The medical on record indicates the age of the victim, which is around 10 years and even the menarche is not started. The medical on record corroborate the allegation of rape and the hymen was shown as old turn and healed.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the age of the victim, which is around 10 years and medical on record corroborate the allegation and also considering the seriousness of the offence, the applicant is not entitled to be released on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rizwanul Haque Ansari, Santi Aakash Kumar @ Anoop .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. November 12, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 5743 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench