[2025:RJ-JP:35932] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6932/2025 Amarchand @ Ankit S/o Shri Laxman, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Harijan Basti, Gram Sali Police , Tehsil Dudu, Police Station Narena, District Jaipur Gramin. At Present Jhapag Stand Harijan Mohalla, Kasba Bagru, Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Is Confined In J/c Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.308/2025 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate for which maximum term of sentence is three years. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits [2025:RJ-JP:35932] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6932/2025] that petitioner is in custody since 18.04.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as twenty three other cases have been registered against him. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not been convicted in any of the case. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate for which maximum term of sentence is three years, so also the fact that no previous conviction of the petitioner has been recorded and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Amarchand @ Ankit S/o Shri Laxman shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:35932] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6932/2025] 8. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 12. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /64