PNO 922190272 SI RAVINDRA YADAV AND 109 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 43 OTHERS
WRIA/9059/2025 · 2025-11-12
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9059 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:-
" i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondent authority to take into consideration the service period spent by the petitioners, while undergoing training before they were appointed as constables for calculating 19 years of service for granting one additional increment according to the Government order dated 02-12-2000. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondent to calculate the service period of the petitioners from the date of appointment and granted one additional increment."
3. Since petitioners' grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to make fresh individual representation before the concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. November 12, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Diwakar Prasad Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Pno 922190272 Si Ravindra Yadav And 109 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 43 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench