APHC010284612013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 37493/2013 Between: 1. K.T. VIJAY KUMAR,, S/O. LATE K. KRISHNA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. 23-12-25/A, ABBURIVARI STREET, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 2. KANUPARTHI BALA KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. LATE K. KRISHNA RAO, AGED 78 YEARS, 101, SINDUR APARTMENT GAYATHRI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 3. M/S. CHEMCEL BIOTECH LTD., THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR ,K.T. VIJAY KUMAR, DOOR NO.16-130/12, JRD TATA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE AUTONAGAR, 3RD CROSS ROAD EXTN. VIJAYAWADA - 520 007. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. CORPORATION BANK, BENZ CIRCLE BRANCH, D.NO. 40-9-76/3, GROUND FLOOR, SAI NAGAR, N.H.5, BENZ CIRCLE VIJAYAWADA- 520 008, 2. GENERAL MANAGER RECOVERY, CORPORATION BANK, CENTRAL OFFICE/ REGISTERED HEAD OFFICE, MANGALORE, KARNATAKA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents declare the letter issued by the respondent vide reference no. CB/0706/2013/Chemcel/01, dated 13-12-2013 in so far as it relates to declaring the petitioner company as willful defaulter and proposal to intimate the names of the petitioners to RBI/CIBIL as illegal, 2 SRS, J W.P.No.37493 of 2013 arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and unauthorized consequently set aside the same in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 46647 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent bank forthwith not to take any action as regards to communication to RBI/CIBIL as willful defaulter in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K V SIMHADRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following Order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was listed 09.07.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption „for dismissal‟. 2. Despite the matter being listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioners. It seems the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 11.07.2025 MJA 3 SRS, J W.P.No.37493 of 2013 58 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 37493 of 2013 Date: 11.07.2025 MJA