Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4836 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tribhuwan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhagyawati Verma,Dinesh Kumar Maurya,Ram Raj Prajapati Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated January 6, 2025 filed by him.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Badlapur, Jaunpur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad