Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20294 (ALL)

ANAND KURIL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/5303/2025 · 2025-04-01

Vikas Budhwar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:45917 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 5303 of 2025 Applicant :- Anand Kuril Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pavanesh Mishra,Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. 1. Heard Sri Pravanesh Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.P. Singh, State Law Officer for the State. 2. Though the application under Section 528 BNSS has been preferred by the applicant for quashing the entire proceeding of summoning order dated 23.09.2022 issued by Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) court no.2/ Judicial Magistrate Kannauj in complaint case no. 52845 of 2022 (Jitendra Kumar vs. Anand Kuril) under Section 138 of N.I. Act, P.S. Kannauj District Kannauj pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D), court no.2/ Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj but the learned counsel for the applicant has confined his relief only for a direction for consideration of the bail application with expedition. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant A.G.A. has no objection to the same. 4. Considering the submissions raised at the Bar and the statements so sought to be made by them, the application stands disposed of while observing that in case appropriate proceeding in the form of bail application is preferred before the court below, then the same shall be decided with most expedition strictly in accordance with the law of the land keeping in view the judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2022) 10 SCC 51. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 /C. MANI (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad