ADITYA PRATAP SINGH @ VIKKI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1184/2025 · 2025-10-28
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202925 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202925 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1184 of 2025 Court No. - 15
HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.51 of 2024 under sections 147, 323, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Maharua, district Ambedkar Nagar. 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Singh, Sameer Kumar Upadhyay, Virijendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aditya Pratap Singh @ Vikki .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). October 28, 2025 kkb/ ABAIL No. 1184 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench