Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20292 (RAJ)

KHEMRAJ SHARMA S/O PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6942/2025 · 2025-07-07

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24982] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6942/2025 Khemraj Sharma S/o Pawan Kumar Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Plot No. 55, Bajrang Vihar Colony, Agra Road, Police Station Jamdoli, District Jaipur. (Raj.) At Present Registrar Birth And Death, Nagar Nigam Heritage, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Kharra, Adv. Mr. Sushil Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Add.GA Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Dy.GA Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, Dy.GA Ms. Basundhara Chauhan, S.I., P.S.- Murlipura HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 07/07/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 20.05.2025 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.5 Jaipur Metro-II (Raj.) in connection with FIR No. 428/2023, registered at Police Station Murlipura, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC, 1860, by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed. [2025:RJ-JP:24982] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6942/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel argues that the accused-applicant is working in Nagar Nigam Heritage, whereas, the forged alleged deed which has been said to be issued by Nagar Nigam Greater. Learned counsel also argues that the charges levelled against the accused- applicant are for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC, 1860, which are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. Learned counsel contends that the accused- applicant was arrested on 08.05.2025 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel further contends that no other criminal case has been registered against the accused-applicant. Learned counsel prays that the investigation and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the facts that the charges levelled against the accused-applicant are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class; that the accused-applicant is behind the bars since 08.05.2025; that the investigation and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant. [2025:RJ-JP:24982] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6942/2025] 6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Khemraj Sharma S/o Pawan Kumar Sharma, arrested in FIR No. 428/2023, registered at Police Station Murlipura, District Jaipur (West) shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 7. The Accused-Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /270