TARANNUM (INFORMANT) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9899/2025 · 2025-11-12
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202899 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202899 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9899 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard Shri Manish Mani Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Aniruddh Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent(s) and perused the materials available on record.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s) :-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Opp. Parties to decide and conduct fair and proper investigation of case crime no. 0307 of 2025 under Sections 85, 103(1), 352 and 351(3) BNS, Police Station - Tanda, District- Ambedkar Nagar from other investigating agency or other Police Station, as early as possible, in the interest of justice."
3. Shri Aniruddh Singh, learned A.G.A. has produced a copy of instructions letter dated 11.11.2025 provided by the Inspector, Police Station Kotwali Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar, the same is taken on record.
4. As per the aforesaid instructions, the deceased was suffering from 'kidney ailment' and her procedure of dialysis was underway. During her treatment she died though, the deceased had lodged a complaint for the ill-treatment by the in-laws. After the death of the deceased her last rites was conducted through burial but on the request of the family members of the deceased her body was recovered from grave, her postmortem was done and viscera was Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Tarannum (Informant) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
preserved. The investigation is going on and till today no incriminating material has been recovered against the accused person, however, if any incriminating material or evidence is found, an appropriate exercise would be undertaken.
5. In the wake of the aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition. Therefore, the present writ petition is consigned to record.
6. However, it is expected from the investigating officer to conduct and conclude the investigation, strictly in accordance with law. November 12, 2025 Praveen CRLP No. 9899 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench