SANTOSH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/6685/2024 · 2025-11-12
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202875 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202875 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6685 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition even in the revised call, however, learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no.4 are present.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. November 12, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Verender Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Anand Kumar, Ramkripal Yadav (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Santosh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench