Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202869 (ALL)

RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/10141/2025 · 2025-10-28

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10141 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Mohd. Yasin, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.197 of 2025, under Sections 65(1), 87, 137 (2) of BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Ahirauli, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 15 years went missing. It was stated that the victim knew the applicant since long and subsequently, the girl was recovered from the applicant. It was also alleged that the applicant had enticed her. In the statement under Section 180 of BNSS, the victim stated that she used to talk with the applicant on telephone and on various occasions physical relations were formed. In the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim stated that the physical relation was formed against her consent, although, she admitted that she knew the applicant. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the two statements of the victim and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 16.07.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Himanshu Singh, Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ravi Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 28, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10141 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench