HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6355 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Avneesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1. 2. Learned Standing Counsel at the very outset has raised preliminary objection that petitioner has filed objections in the proceedings under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya in the capacity of Pradhan of Gaon Sabha - Semra, but present writ petition has been filed for expeditious disposal of the proceedings by the petitioner in personal capacity, whereas the writ petition should have been filed either on behalf of Gaon Sabha or by the Gaon Sabha itself. 3. At this stage learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the appropriate authority/person to file fresh writ petition. 4. In the light of above, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. October 28, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avneesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Raj Laxmi .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench