HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6112 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Sri Mohd. Ateeq Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that because of some defects in the petition, he does not want to press the same and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. Let the certified copies of orders/documents be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining their photocopies on record. October 28, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ateeq Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ramesh Chandra Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Law U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench