AJMER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10239/2025 · 2025-10-28
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202863 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202863 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10239 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Short counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Dinesh Pratap Verma, who has filed his vakalatnama today on behalf of the informant and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.190 of 2025, under Sections 65(1) BNS and Sections 3/4(2) POCSO Act, P.S. Rupaideeha, District Bahraich.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that that both the parties are ready and willing to marry. It is stated that the FIR was lodged at the instance of the members of the society.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 26.6.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ajmer be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Kumar Chaudhary, Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajmer .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10239 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench