HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6204 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to opposite party No.1 i. e. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lucknow to decide revision No.286/2024, Brij Bhan Vs. Roop Rani and others, under Section 48 (1) of U.P.C.H.Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is decided in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing counsel has no objection, if direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the revision. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, opposite party No.2 i. e. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lucknow is directed to decide revision No.286/2024, Brij Bhan Vs. Roop Rani and others, under Section 48 (1) of U.P.C.H.Act, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar, Ram Vishal Tripathi, Tarun Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Roop Rani .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6204 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench